DePaul nameplate

""

 

Find it Fast:
Get requirements specific to your college and major here.


Find it Fast:
Learn about how to design your LSP here.
To learn about interest areas click here.


Find it Fast:
Get Study Abroad Course Equivalencies here.


Religious Dimensions

Courses in the Religious Dimensions domain offer students the opportunity to explore the explicitly religious dimensions of life and culture. These dimensions are found in the culturally embedded narratives, beliefs and practices of particular religions, as well as in encounters with realities perceived to be ultimate or sacred. Through myth, symbol, ritual and doctrine, these religions not only provide order and meaning, they also carry capacities to challenge and transform individuals and societies. Intellectual and social maturity requires understanding the unique contributions, both positive and negative, of the religious traditions of the world to culture and consciousness. It also requires coming to terms with questions of ultimacy. This learning domain offers courses with a comparative, thematic or ethical focus, as well as courses in specific traditions.

Courses identified under the category of Religious and Ethical Questions consider various definitions of religion; identify religion's important elements and issues; compare these elements and issues across different religions; examine religious ethical systems; and investigate the truth
claims made by religions. Courses identified under the category of Religious Traditions examine the origins and historical development of particular religious traditions, and explore the impact that religions, cultures and societies have had upon each other.

Learning Outcomes and Writing Expectations
Approved by the Liberal Studies Council, Spring 2006

Reading Guidelines:

By the end of the quarter, as indicated by a course's syllabus, a student will have read approximately:

  1. 750 pp. for any 100-level course; and
  2. 1000 pp. for any 200-level course.

These page numbers are meant as guidelines and may vary depending on disciplinary learning expectations. For example, a 250 page novel is likely to be considerably easier for students to read and grasp than a set of short, 20 page articles concerned with theoretical or philosophical issues. The instructor should use his/her best judgment on the difficulties of the assigned reading, but should try to come as close to these guidelines as is reasonably possible.

Content and Focus:

As indicated by a course's syllabus, a student will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate a working knowledge of some significant elements of religion such as: myth and narrative, symbol, ritual law and doctrine, ethics and/or religious experience as they appear within the context of religious and/or ethical questions.
  2. In addition to the above learning goal that applies to all students in all classes, a student will be able to address the criteria of either of the following categories:

Religious and Ethical Questions (formerly called Patterns and Problems): A student in one of these classes will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate an understanding of distinctively religious lives and practices, either through critical comparison of two or more religious traditions, or through an analytic or normative treatment of explicitly religious themes or issues.
  2. Identify explicitly religious modes of thinking, reflecting, acting and feeling, in their personal significance and/or communal dimensions.
  3. Demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between religion and other elements of society in such issues as the connection between religion and power, the role of religious movements as forces of personal and social transformation and social justice, and the role of religion in social integration.

Religious Traditions (formerly called Traditions in Context): A student in one of these classes will be able to demonstrate a working knowledge of:

  1. The origins and historical development of particular religious traditions, and the impact those religions, cultures, and societies have had upon each other.
  2. One or more religious traditions’ evolving self-understanding, and be able to discern the distinctive features by which outside interpreters recognize those traditions.
  3. At least one of the following two topics, the:
    a. Study of interactions of specific religions and cultures in specific historic settings (the who, what, where, when, why and what happened); and/or
    b. Investigation of the role of religious movements as forces of personal and social change.

Liberal Studies Learning Goals:

The syllabus will support LSP Learning Goals by indicating that all students in RDD courses must, in their reading, assignments, and activities, demonstrate a:

  1. Development of some critical and creative reflection skills (spelled out in a bit more detail in our writing goals);
  2. Consciousness of how one or more religious tradition have shaped their vision(s) of reality, values, and spirituality;
  3. Critical and balanced understanding of cultural diversity; and
  4. Working knowledge of various approaches to the study and interpretation of religion.

Writing Expectations:

By the end of the quarter, a student will have written a minimum total of 10 pages of writing beyond whatever writing s/he does in class, such as essay exams or responses to discussion questions. These pages are to be done outside of class and may include assignments such as reaction papers to their readings, essays answering questions posed by the instructor, or reports on fieldwork. This does not include journal writing. The syllabus will indicate this through its assignments.

Students will demonstrate skills in the following four areas:

Domain Specific Skills: These include skillful use of both religious studies language and sources, and should be included in all papers to whatever degree they are applicable:

An Adequate Use of Language Pertinent to the Study of Religions

  1. Conceptual Religious language (e.g., dharma, jihad, trinitarian theologies, natural law, etc.);
  2. Historical language (e.g., historical era, places, groups, dates, etc.);
  3. Methodological language (e.g., exegesis, apology, culture, norms, deontological ethical theories, etc.).

An Adequate Use of Sources: This includes three skills, which should be applicable whether the paper is, for example, a reaction paper to a reading or a research project.

  1. A Depth of Use of Resources (i.e., not simply a mere mention of only one or two resources);
  2. The Use of a Variety of Resources (i.e., again, more than a couple sources, and preferably not resources that all mirror each other);
  3. Accurate Assessment of Sources: the ability to discriminate between reliable and unreliable; and scholarly and popular sources;
  4. Adequate and Accurate Citation according to clear guidelines provided by the instructor.

Methodological Skills: These include an adequately skillful use of methodological approaches, including:

  1. The ability to historically contextualize the topic, when applicable;
  2. The ability to adequately interpret empirical data, when applicable (e.g., historical, ethnographic, sociological…etc.)
  3. The ability to consciously apply theoretical approaches (both by clearly describing those theories and by either critically analyzing them or actually using them in a particular context); and
  4. If the assignment involves comparison, the paper should demonstrate a nominally sophisticated use of comparative approaches (i.e., more than just superficially pointing out some similarity and contrast without any depth or relating of that comparison to anything else).

Higher Level Thinking Skills: In writing assignments, these skills include the following:

  1. An indication of a thesis, argument or good question that shows some critical depth;
  2. An ability to analyze a reading or issue by breaking it into its logically related elements;
  3. The capacity to synthesize or bring together distinct elements from various resources into a logically coherent conclusion; and
  4. The presence of some nascent creative thinking, depending on the class context (e.g., an old idea may be very new for a beginning student if that idea was not presented to them through the course materials and lectures; i.e., beginning students are very good at reinventing wheels, but this can be considered creative thinking if they are not simply parroting back what they have already learned in class).

Mechanical and Composition Skills: In addition to the skills required of writing done for Religious Studies, a good student paper should demonstrate the following, somewhat more general skills taught in the Liberal Studies Writing Program.

  1. Mechanical Skills: The following mechanical skills will appear in a good paper; a good paper will:
    a. Mechanics and Spelling: Be virtually free of errors, spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Given the availability of electronic spell-checkers, a good essay will contain no more than a very few spelling errors. Nor will it contain multiple mistakes in agreement, punctuation of independent and dependent clauses, or the placement of modifiers.
    b. Sentence Structure: Use sentences that are complete and lucid, and will not use sentence fragments pointlessly or statements that are so convoluted that their sense is garbled.
  2. Composition Skills: The following composition skills will appear in a good paper; a good paper will:
    a. Responsiveness: Fully respond to the assignment and address the subject and issues of that assignment.
    b. Coherence: Develop an appropriate and coherent position or point in both its overall structure and its separate parts, and not merely report data pointlessly.
    c. Support: Support its positions or main ideas with clear, convincing, specific and accurate evidence.
    d. Appropriate Diction: Use language that is appropriately shaped to its audience and accounts for its readers
    .
""